Skip to main content
Download PDF

Oscillatory mechanics at birth for identifying infants requiring surfactant: a prospective, observational trial

Respiratory Research volume 22, Article number: 314 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Current criteria for surfactant administration assume that hypoxia is a direct marker of lung-volume de-recruitment. We first introduced an early, non-invasive assessment of lung mechanics by the Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) and evaluated its role in predicting the need for surfactant therapy.

Objectives

To evaluate whether lung reactance (Xrs) assessment by FOT within 2 h of birth identifies infants who would need surfactant within 24 h; to eventually determine Xrs performance and a cut-off value for early detection of infants requiring surfactant.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational, non-randomized study in our tertiary NICU in Milan. Eligible infants were born between 27+0 and 34+6 weeks’ gestation, presenting respiratory distress after birth. Exclusion criteria: endotracheal intubation at birth, major malformations participation in other interventional trials, parental consent denied. We assessed Xrs during nasal CPAP at 5 cmH2O at 10 Hz within 2 h of life, recording flow and pressure tracing through a Fabian Ventilator for off-line analysis. Clinicians were blinded to FOT results.

Results

We enrolled 61 infants, with a median [IQR] gestational age of 31.9 [30.3; 32.9] weeks and birth weight 1490 [1230; 1816] g; 2 infants were excluded from the analysis for set-up malfunctioning. 14/59 infants received surfactant within 24 h. Xrs predicted surfactant need with a cut-off − 33.4 cmH2O*s/L and AUC-ROC = 0.86 (0.76–0.96), with sensitivity 0.85 and specificity 0.83. An Xrs cut-off value of − 23.3 cmH2O*s/L identified infants needing surfactant or respiratory support > 28 days with AUC-ROC = 0.89 (0.81–0.97), sensitivity 0.86 and specificity 0.77. Interestingly, 12 infants with Xrs < − 23.3 cmH2O*s/L (i.e. de-recruited lungs) did not receive surfactant and subsequently required prolonged respiratory support.

Conclusion

Xrs assessed within 2 h of life predicts surfactant need and respiratory support duration in preterm infants. The possible role of Xrs in improving the individualization of respiratory management in preterm infants deserves further investigation.

Introduction

Despite significant advances in neonatal care, the Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) still represents one of the most challenging complications after preterm birth [1]. Poor lung compliance primarily characterizes RDS and provokes alveolar collapse and lung volume de-recruitment, with impaired gas exchange and increased need for pressure support [2, 3]. Both atelectasis and high-volume ventilation lead to inflammation and ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI) [4,5,6]. Therefore, preterm infants with RDS often require a prolonged course of respiratory assistance and oxygen supplementation, which are both “life-saving” treatments and risk factors for the development of long-term respiratory sequelae [7,8,9].

Exogenous pulmonary surfactant promotes lung volume recruitment by reducing the surface tension in the peripheral lung [3, 10], and mitigates lung tissues inflammation [11, 12]. Also, the increasing popularity of “lung-protective strategies” such as surfactant administration by INSURE or Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA)/Minimally Invasive Surfactant Administration (MIST) have limited the use of invasive mechanical ventilation [13, 14]. Therefore, exogenous surfactant may enhance the success of non-invasive respiratory support [15]. However, to maximise benefits, surfactant administration should occur as soon as possible after birth [16].

Although the reduction of peripheral lung aeration is the most relevant functional impairment of RDS, current criteria for surfactant administration are based on the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) required to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) within a target range in infants with worsening respiratory conditions [13, 14]. An oxygen demand-based approach is simple and straightforward for applicability in clinical practice, but it assumes that peripheral oxygenation is a direct marker of lung volume recruitment. On the other hand, multiple factors such as cardiovascular transition, impaired haemodynamic and metabolic status, thermoregulation, and infections may affect oxygen demand during the first few hours after birth [17]. Infants with a surfactant-deficient, de-recruited lung have a variable capacity to compensate for hypoxia by increasing transpulmonary pressure with increased work of breathing (WOB) [18], and a mere, qualitative assessment of respiratory distress may delay surfactant administration. Hence, quantitative criteria encompassing a direct assessment of lung volume recruitment status might allow an early, sensitive and specific identification of infants with surfactant-deficient lungs.

In recent years, the Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT)—or “oscillometry”—emerged as a non-invasive tool for evaluating the respiratory system’s mechanical properties [19,20,21,22,23]. In particular, studies demonstrated that the total respiratory system reactance (Xrs) measured at frequencies lower than 10 Hz at a given distending pressure is a sensitive and specific indicator of lung volume recruitment [19, 24]. FOT measurements are suitable at the bedside in preterm infants during invasive [25,26,27,28,29] and non-invasive respiratory support [30], and even during respiratory stabilization in the delivery room [31]. Moreover, oscillometry assessments in the first few days of life can predict respiratory support duration [27, 30].

We hypothesized that the detection of lung volume de-recruitment by FOT might early identify patients requiring exogenous pulmonary surfactant. Therefore, we tested the correlation between early lung function and a high FIO2 requirement in the first 24 h of life. According to current criteria, a good correlation would suggest that infants with poor lung mechanics at 2 h of life are likely to match oxygenation-based criteria for surfactant administration in the following hours. Consequently, the assessment of lung mechanics would allow an earlier administration of surfactant to the same infants that would receive it according to the current method. On the other hand, different indications between the two methods may highlight different sensitivity in identifying surfactant-deficient subjects. Even if the current approach based on oxygen requirement has limitations, to propose new, not yet validated criteria for surfactant administration that differs from guidelines, we first designed a pilot, observational study to compare the novel approach based on lung mechanics with the gold standard. This mandatory first step would allow identifying agreements and differences between the methods and provide essential data for designing large randomized controlled trials to test the clinical impact of the new approach on clinical outcomes.

The objectives of the current study were, therefore: (1) to evaluate whether an early non-invasive assessment of Xrs performed within 2 h of birth discriminates patients that would meet the current clinical criteria for surfactant replacement therapy in the first day of life and (2) to determine a cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity of Xrs for early detection of infants requiring pulmonary surfactant.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, observational pilot study in our tertiary NICU in Milan. Our ethical committee approved the research protocol in April 2016 (no. 462_2015). We recruited the study participants between December 2016 and February 2020, whose follow-up lasted until discharge home.

Inborn infants between 27+0 and 34+6 weeks’ gestation were eligible after obtaining parental consent. Ineligibility criteria included: major congenital abnormalities, intubation before the study entry, neonatal ARDS [32] and participation in interventional studies. Participant selection followed a convenience series based on the timely availability of the research team.

Participants’ clinical management followed institutional guidelines. Infants with signs of respiratory distress had a chest radiograph or lung ultrasounds and received nasal CPAP (NCPAP) for Silverman score > 5 or FIO2 > 0.30 to target SpO2 89–93% in infants ≤ 32+6 weeks or 90–95% in infants > 32+6 weeks. Surfactant administration (Curosurf, Chiesi, Parma, Italy 200 mg/kg) occurred by INSURE technique if FIO2 > 0.40 to target SpO2 [33], or because of a sustained increase in FIO2 associated with a Silverman score > 6 after NCPAP initiation. Criteria for starting MV were persistent FIO2 > 0.40 to target SpO2 after surfactant therapy; apnea spells > 4 in 1 h or > 2 requiring positive pressure ventilation; pH < 7.20 and pCO2 > 70 mmHg after receiving NCPAP; or as deemed by clinicians for deteriorating clinical conditions.

Antenatal and perinatal variables were available from the electronic medical records. We considered the following clinical outcomes: administration of surfactant within 24 h; duration of non-invasive respiratory support and MV; the rate of air-leaks, bronchopulmonary dysplasia [34], prematurity-related complications (air-leak syndromes, respiratory support at 36 weeks of gestation, sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular haemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis); and length of hospital stay.

We assessed respiratory mechanics at 2 ± 1 SD h from birth. Pressure oscillations at 10 Hz were delivered through a nasal mask over 5 min of quiet breathing during NCPAP at 5 cmH2O (Fabian HFO, Vyaire, USA). The FOT frequency was set at 10 Hz as the newborns breathing frequency is higher compared to children and adults and it may interfere with the 5 Hz FOT signal used in previous studies [27]. Flow and pressure tracing were provided by the mechanical ventilator at 200 Hz and recorded on a laptop for subsequent off-line analysis. Xrs was computed using the least squared method [35]. During the procedure, clinicians adjusted FIO2 to maintain SpO2 targets. As Xrs was computed off-line, the medical team was blinded to FOT results.

We evaluated the prediction accuracy of Xrs for identifying infants who received surfactant within 24 h of life (Surf < 24 h group) from those who did not (No-Surf < 24 h group) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). We calculated the cut-off value by the J-index. For the sample size calculation, we considered a type I error of 0.05, power 0.85, AUC 0.75 and hypotesised that 25% of infants will receive surfactant, obtaining an estimated sample size of 55 infants. Allowing a dropout rate of 10%, we estimate a sample size of 61.

We additionally divided infants that did not received surfactant before 24 h according to subsequent respiratory history: “better respiratory outcome” (BRO) were infants that never required respiratory support (spontaneous breathing, SB) or received non-invasive respiratory support < 28 days (“short-NIV”); and “worse respiratory outcome” (WRO) included infants who required surfactant or invasive mechanical ventilation (any time) or non-invasive support > 28 days (“long-NIV or Surf > 24 h”). We calculated the AUC-ROC for characterizing Xrs to identify the BRO and WRO infants.

We expressed continuous variables as median [IQR]. We compared continuous variables among more than 2 and 2 groups by Kruskal–Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks test and Mann–Whitney Rank Sum test, respectively. We compared dichotomous variables by Fisher Exact tests and expressed them as number (percentage).

Results

The flow diagram (Fig. 1) represents the eligible infants hospitalized in our NICU during the study period and those excluded with reasons for non-participation. All 61 infants enrolled well-tolerated the study protocol and were able to complete the follow-up. We excluded two subjects from the final analysis for technical issues with the flow and pressure tracing (set-up malfunctioning).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The diagram represents patients’ flow. We reported the overall number of potentially eligible infants (born between27+0 and 34+6 weeks' gestation, hospitalized in our NICU—which is a reference center for fetal and postnatal surgery—during the study period), the infants excluded (with reasons for exclusion), those confirmed for eligibility and included in the study, completing follow-up, and analyzed. Some infants presented ≥ 1 reason for exclusion

Full size image

Table 1 reports the two groups' demographic and clinical characteristics (Surf < 24 h and No-Surf < 24 h). Infants who received surfactant within 24 h from birth had a higher but not statistically significant need for resuscitation at birth and a longer duration of non-invasive and invasive respiratory support. The other outcomes explored did not differ significantly. Table 2 shows the participants' variables for the four groups (spontaneous breathing, short-NIV, long-NIVorSurf > 24 h and Surf < 24 h groups).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population
Full size table
Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics for the 4 groups (spontaneous breathing, short-NIV, long-NIV or Surf > 24 h and Surf < 24 h) and for the 2 groups (Better and Worse Clinical Outcome) according to the subsequent clinical outcomes
Full size table

In the dot-plot of Fig. 2, we represented the individual values of Xrs in the Surf < 24 h and No-Surf < 24 h groups. Xrs predicted infants needing surfactant within 24 h from birth with an AUC-ROC of 0.86. The identified cut-off of Xrs was − 33.4 cmH2O*s/L, with a sensitivity of 0.85 (0.55–0.98) and specificity of 0.83 (0.69–0.92).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The top panel represents the dot plot of individual respiratory reactance (Xrs) in the two groups: infants receiving surfactant < 24 h from birth (on the right) and those who did not (on the left). The bottom panels represent the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of Xrs for predicting surfactant administration < 24 h (bottom-left panel) and sensitivity and specificity of Xrs at different values (bottom-right panel). The best-identified cut-off of Xrs was − 33.4 cmH2O*s/L

Full size image

In the No-Surf < 24 h group, eight infants had an Xrs < − 33.4 cmH2O*s/L but did not receive surfactant within 24 h. During the subsequent NICU stay, they required longer respiratory support than infants who received surfactant within 24 h from birth (median (IQR) 30 (3; 44) days vs 2 (1; 6) days).

Eight infants (GA: 29.0–33.6) never required respiratory support (SB), 23 (GA: 29.0–34.7) received non-invasive respiratory support < 28 days (short-NIV), 16 (GA: 27.9–32.7) required surfactant after 24 h of life (3 infants) or non-invasive support > 28 days (long-NIV or Surf > 24 h), and 14 (GA: 27.8–34.1) received surfactant within 24 h (Surf < 24 h). In Fig. 3, we illustrated individual Xrs values according to the subsequent respiratory history. The median [IQR] Xrs were − 13 (− 16; 10), − 19(− 27; − 16), − 30(− 52; − 24), − 44(− 71; − 37) cmH2O*s/L respectively for SB, short-NIVlong-NIVorSurf > 24 h and Surf < 24 h. Infants who needed surfactant within 24 h and infants who required surfactant after 24 h of life or non-invasive support > 28 days showed lower and more variable Xrs values at 2 h of life. Xrs < − 23.3cmH2O*s/L predicted infants with “worse respiratory outcomes” (WRO) with AUC-ROC = 0.89 (Fig. 3), sensitivity of 0.86 (0.67–0.96) and specificity of 0.77 (0.59–0.90).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Dot plot of individual respiratory reactance (Xrs) (top panel) for the four groups: spontaneously breathing infants with no support (SB) and infants receiving NIV < 28 days (short-NIV) on the left (better respiratory outcome, BRO); infants receiving surfactant < 24 h (Surf < 24 h) and receiving surfactant after 24 h or NIV > 28 days (NIV-long or Surf > 24 h) on the right (worse respiratory outcome, WRO). The bottom panels show the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of Xrs for predicting WRO (bottom-left panel) and sensitivity and specificity of Xrs at different values (bottom- right panel). The best-identified cut-off of Xrs was − 23.3 cmH2O*s/L

Full size image

Discussion

The main findings of the current study are that in preterm infants receiving NCPAP (1) an “early” lung mechanics assessment by FOT during the postnatal transition is feasible; (2) a Xrs cut-off value of − 33.4 cmH2O*s/L detected 85% of infants who received surfactant within 24 h from birth following current oxygenation-based criteria; (3) the same threshold identified 8 patients who did not receive surfactant in the first 24 h of life, despite their poor lung mechanics, because they did not match current criteria for surfactant treatment; interestingly, the vast majority of them developed poor respiratory outcomes, requiring a longer duration of respiratory support as compared to infants with poor lung mechanics who received surfactant; (4) when patients were grouped considering their respiratory outcomes, Xrs at 2 h of life detected patients with ‘worse respiratory outcomes’, (i.e. patients who either received surfactant or required respiratory support for > 28 days) with an AUC-ROC of 0.89. A cut-off value of − 23.3 cmH2O*s/L provided a sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.77 for identifying worse respiratory outcomes patients.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the role of early lung mechanics assessment for individualizing surfactant therapy. Most previous studies on lung mechanics in preterm infants focused on correlation with long-term respiratory outcomes, such as the duration of respiratory support or the occurrence of chronic lung disease (CLD) [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Several approaches have been suggested for assessing lung mechanical properties in preterm infants, including the interrupter technique [39] or the single-occlusion technique [36, 39,40,41,42, 44] or by fitting the equation of motion of the respiratory system [37,38,39, 43]. The need for either the absence of spontaneous breathing or the capability to measure spontaneous respiratory efforts and the complexity of those techniques limit their applicability during the critical phase of preterm infant postnatal adaptation. Pioneering studies showed the feasibility of the forced oscillation technique on preterm infants [24]. Oscillometry is less invasive than other techniques for assessing lung mechanics; it does not require patients' disconnection from the ventilatory circuit nor interfere with the ventilator. The technique does not involve estimating the pleural pressure by positioning an oesophagal balloon or evoking the Hering–Breuer inflation reflex for respiratory muscle relaxation. Previous studies demonstrated FOT feasibility in the delivery room [31] and the NICU, both in intubated patients [27,28,29] and infants receiving NCPAP [30]. Moreover, thanks to recent technological advancements, oscillometry can be now integrated into modern mechanical ventilators.

Oscillometry performed within 2 h of life identified infants with compromised respiratory mechanics who required the administration [16] of pulmonary surfactant on the first day of life as per standard criteria [33]. Considering that the administration of surfactant occurred at a mean (std) 8 ± 5 h of life, the use of FOT may support a more timely administration, with potential impacts on the efficacy of the therapy [16].

While most infants with poor Xrs matched oxygenation-based clinical criteria for surfactant replacement therapy within the first 24 h of life, several infants did not. These discrepancies may result from the physiological meaning of the two parameters, i.e. lung volume recruitment and oxygenation. Preterm infants with lung volume de-recruitment have a variable ability to compensate for the reduced gas exchange by increasing their WOB. Infants generating high transpulmonary pressure can counterbalance the insufficient lung volume recruitment and limit their oxygen supplementation need in the first few hours after birth. However, developing high transpulmonary pressures may excessively stress the lung tissue and lead to inflammation and patient self-inflicted lung injury [45]. Interestingly, the only patient of our study who developed a pneumothorax (which required chest drain and invasive mechanical ventilation) was one of the infants with poor lung mechanics at birth who did not receive surfactant within 24 h of life because of low oxygen demand. Moreover, increased WOB may result in progressive muscle exhaustion, protracting the need for respiratory support. Since our secondary exploratory analysis on patients’ sub-groups showed that the surfactant group had an overall shorter respiratory support duration than the long-NIV group despite overlapping oscillatory mechanics data, we speculated that some infants of the long-NIV group might have benefited from surfactant therapy, regardless of current indications [13].

Our secondary exploratory analysis also showed that, despite several possible determinants for prolonged respiratory support may develop in the first 28 days of life, if lung reactance is impaired at birth, the risk of negative respiratory outcomes is increased. This is also in line with the finding of other studies which compared FOT data to clinical parameters and respiratory outcomes [27, 30] and found that FOT data in addition to GA improved prediction of days of respiratory support or BPD development. Future investigations should evaluate whether the possibility to identify infants more susceptible to lung injury early at birth can improve tailoring their respiratory management. As FOT can be easily performed, repeating the test with time may also provide useful information on the evolution of the patients in response to different events and medical interventions.

Only 2 out of 13 infants received surfactant without presenting poor Xrs because they matched the current clinical criteria. Surfactant therapy exposes infants to direct laryngoscopy and related side effects (e.g. trauma, bleeding, haemodynamic instability, pain requiring analgesic drugs) even when applied by less invasive methods and imposes high economic and environmental costs (animal-derived product). Therefore, early lung mechanics assessment at birth might allow more appropriate surfactant therapy with economic and ethical benefits.

Metanalysis showed that “prophylactic” surfactant decreases infants mortality, the risk of air leaks, and the composite outcome of BPD or death [46]. Later metanalysis, including studies with more extensive and early use of non-invasive CPAP, demonstrated that “selective” surfactant associates with a lower risk of chronic lung disease or death [47], therefore, “prophylactic” surfactant use had been discontinued. “Early selective” surfactant administration coupled with NCPAP reduces the risk of BPD and air-leak syndromes compared to “later selective” surfactant followed by MV [48]. Moreover, a lower treatment threshold (FIO2 < 0.45) as compared to a higher one (FIO2 > 0.45) reduces the rate of air-leak syndromes and BPD [48]. However, to date, no trial directly compared different thresholds of FIO2 for the first surfactant administration. Kattwinkel et al. [49] compared two thresholds (FIO2 > 0.30 versus FIO2 > 0.40) for the second and further doses surfactant. They found no difference in the duration of MV or any long-term respiratory outcomes except for significantly higher mortality in infants with complicated RDS who received treatment according to a high threshold. Dargaville et al. found that FIO2 > 0.30 is the critical cut-off, which increases the risk of CPAP failure in infants < 32 weeks gestation with an AUC of 0.80 [50]. Based on these retrospective observations, the authors of the European consensus recently updated the guidelines on surfactant administration suggesting FIO2 > 0.30 as a threshold for surfactant therapy regardless of GA or other risk factors. However, CPAP failure intended as the need for intubation and endotracheal ventilation is not the only adverse respiratory scenario for preterm infants, as documented by the increasing number of premature infants who develop chronic sequelae receiving minimal or even no MV. Laughon et al. [51] identified three respiratory disease patterns among extremely preterm infants based on the FIO2 required during the first two weeks of life. 20% of infants with low FIO2 both in the first week and at 14 days have a low incidence of CLD (17%). By contrast, most infants with FIO2 > 0.25 both during the first and second weeks develop CLD (67%). The remaining infants with low FIO2 at the start and increased the oxygen requirement by 14 days still have a considerable risk of CLD (51%). These findings demonstrate that oxygen demand alone cannot fully identify the early origins of lung disease in preterm infants.

We believe that hypoxia is only an indirect marker of alveolar recruitment. The capability to compensate for hypoxia may vary among different infants and is not easily predictable by GA alone. Preterm infants with surfactant-deficient lungs may counterbalance alveolar de-recruitment by increasing muscle fatigue, potentially delaying or even denying an effective surfactant administration. By increasing their WOB, these infants also exercise mechanical stress on the lung tissues, generating self-inflicted lung injury [45]. Additionally, relying exclusively on oxygenation for determining surfactant need may lead to useless (and potentially harmful) surfactant treatments. In addition to lung volume recruitment, haemodynamic changes, metabolic status, thermoregulation and inflammation may affect oxygen demand. Limitations of the standard oxygenation-based approach to surfactant therapy have increased the interest for surfactant predictive tests, such as the Lamellar Body Counts on gastric aspirates and the lung ultrasounds, which are still under evaluation [52,53,54]. Further large multicentre studies should compare Xrs measurements versus the other available techniques for predicting surfactant need [54]. Finally, an earlier and more appropriate surfactant administration may have long-term effects on the preterm lung, protecting the lung parenchyma from excessive mechanical stress and enhancing a more physiological respiratory adaptation long term.

The current study has limitations. First, the participant selection occurred based on the research team's availability due to experience with the experimental set-up. Nonetheless, to limit the observation and confirmation bias, the assessors of lung mechanics were blinded to test results; similarly, the investigators performing the off-line analysis of lung reactance were not aware of patients’ clinical details until the end of the recruitment. Second, the study population's choice of 27–34 weeks' gestation might have excluded infants with more severe RDS. The GA range choice was due to both ongoing competitive trials involving lower GA infants in the Unit and the experimental set-up. Changing the respiratory support device for the study acquisition might have disrupted the more immature infants during the delicate adaptation stage. However, more premature infants receive surfactant in a higher percentage of cases. Whereas in the GA range included in the study, the probability of receiving surfactant is more variable and unpredictable, and the identification of predictors may be more valuable. Finally, we conducted a monocentric study. However, the data acquired in our centre are in line with a previous publication evaluating lung mechanics during NCPAP in the first week of life for feasibility, tolerability and range of measurements (Xrs at 2 days was –26.13 (12.43) cm H2O*s/L). We also confirmed previous research findings, demonstrating a correlation between early lung mechanics assessment and respiratory support duration in intubated [27] and spontaneously breathing infants [30]. Considering the agreement with previous publications, the sample size, and the technique's reproducibility, we believe that our findings may have valid generalizability, even though a comparison within a larger population of similar GA and assistance level is necessary before drawing definite conclusions.

In conclusions, according to our data, a non-invasive assessment of lung mechanics within 2 h of birth is feasible, and Xrs value predicts the need for surfactant as defined by current clinical administration criteria. Xrs also identifies infants who later develop poor respiratory outcomes. Providing an objective evaluation, Xrs combined with oxygenation may help clinicians tailor a more timely and individualized approach to surfactant therapy. Whether the use of early oscillatory mechanics for guiding surfactant therapy in addition to oxygen-based criteria may improve respiratory outcomes of premature infants deserves further evaluation by conducting large multicenter diagnostic accuracy studies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AUC-ROC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

BRO:

Better respiratory outcome

BPD:

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

CLD:

Chronic lung disease

CPAP:

Continuous positive airway pressure

FIO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

FOT:

Forced oscillation technique

INSURE:

Intubation surfactant extubation

IQR:

Interquartile range

LISA:

Less invasive surfactant administration

MIST:

Minimally invasive surfactant administration

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

NCPAP:

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

NIV:

Non-invasive ventilation

RDS:

Respiratory distress syndrome

SB:

Spontaneous breathing

SD:

Standard deviation

SpO2 :

Peripheral oxygen saturation

VILI:

Ventilation-induced lung injury

WOB:

Work of breathing

WRO:

Worse respiratory outcome

Xrs:

Oscillatory respiratory reactance

References

  1. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Walsh MC, Carlo WA, Shankaran S, et al. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm Neonates, 1993–2012. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2015;314(10):1039–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Macklem PT, Proctor DF, Hogg JC. The stability of peripheral airways. Respir Physiol. 1970;8(2):191–203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez-Gil J, Weaver TE. Pulmonary surfactant pathophysiology: current models and open questions. Physiology. 2010;25(3):132–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Björklund LJ, Ingimarsson J, Curstedt T, John J, Robertson B, Werner O, et al. Manual ventilation with a few large breaths at birth compromises the therapeutic effect of subsequent surfactant replacement in immature lambs. Pediatr Res. 1997;42(3):348–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lachmann B. Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(6):319–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Caironi P. Stress and strain within the lung. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012;18(1):42–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jobe AH, Hillman N, Polglase G, Kramer BW, Kallapur S, Pillow J. Injury and inflammation from resuscitation of the preterm infant. Neonatology. 2008;94(3):190–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simpson SJ, Turkovic L, Wilson AC, Verheggen M, Logie KM, Pillow JJ, et al. Lung function trajectories throughout childhood in survivors of very preterm birth: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal. 2018;2(5):350–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lavizzari A, Zannin E, Ophorst M, Ciuffini F, Gangi S, Farolfi A, et al. Tidal breathing measurements in former preterm infants: a retrospective longitudinal study. J Pediatr. 2021;230:112-118.e4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujiwara T, Chida S, Watabe Y, Maeta H, Morita T, Abe T. Artificial surfactant therapy in hyaline-membrane disease. Lancet. 1980;315(8159):55–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kishore U, Greenhough TJ, Waters P, Shrive AK, Ghai R, Kamran MF, et al. Surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D: structure, function and receptors. Mol Immunol. 2006;43(9):1293–315.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tingay DG, Rajapaksa A, McCall K, Zonneveld CEE, Black D, Perkins E, et al. The interrelationship of recruitment maneuver at birth, antenatal steroids, and exogenous surfactant on compliance and oxygenation in preterm lambs. Pediatr Res. 2016;79(6):916–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Te Pas A, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome—2019 update. Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Polin RA, Carlo WA, Papile LA, Tan R, Kumar P, Benitz W, et al. Surfactant replacement therapy for preterm and term neonates with respiratory distress. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):156–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kribs A, Hummler H. Ancillary therapies to enhance success of non-invasive modes of respiratory support—approaches to delivery room use of surfactant and caffeine? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(3):212–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahadue FL, Soll R. Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/14651858.CD001456.pub2/full.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. de Boode WP, van der Lee R, Eriksen BH, Nestaas E, Dempsey E, Singh Y, et al. The role of neonatologist performed echocardiography in the assessment and management of neonatal shock. Pediatr Res. 2018;84:57–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Stocks J. Respiratory physiology during early life. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1999;54(4):358–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dellaca RL, Andersson Olerud M, Zannin E, Kostic P, Pompilio PP, Hedenstierna G, et al. Lung recruitment assessed by total respiratory system input reactance. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(12):2164–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kostic P, Zannin E, Andersson Olerud M, Pompilio PP, Hedenstierna G, Pedotti A, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure optimization with forced oscillation technique reduces ventilator induced lung injury: a controlled experimental study in pigs with saline lavage lung injury. Crit Care. 2011;15(3):R126.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dellacà RL, Zannin E, Ventura ML, Sancini G, Pedotti A, Tagliabue P, et al. Assessment of dynamic mechanical properties of the respiratory system during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation*. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(11):2502–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Veneroni C, Dahl MJ, Lavizzari A, Dawson E, Studstill S, Bowen S, et al. Months of age. Physiol Meas. 2020;40(10):105007.

    Google Scholar 

  23. King GG, Bates J, Berger KI, Calverley P, de Melo PL, Dellacà RL, et al. Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(2):1900753.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pillow JJ, Sly PD, Hantos Z. Monitoring of lung volume recruitment and derecruitment using oscillatory mechanics during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the preterm lamb. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5(2):172–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dellacà RL, Veneroni C, Vendettuoli V, Zannin E, Matassa PG, Pedotti A, et al. Relationship between respiratory impedance and positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated neonates. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(3):511–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vendettuoli V, Veneroni C, Zannin E, Mercadante D, Matassa P, Pedotti A, et al. Positional effects on lung mechanics of ventilated preterm infants with acute and chronic lung disease. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(8):798–804.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Veneroni C, Wallström L, Sindelar R, Dellacaʼ RL. Oscillatory respiratory mechanics on the first day of life improves prediction of respiratory outcomes in extremely preterm newborns. Pediatr Res. 2019;85(3):312–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wallström L, Veneroni C, Zannin E, Dellacà RL, Sindelar R. Forced oscillation technique for optimising PEEP in ventilated extremely preterm infants. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5):1901650.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Raffaeli G, Veneroni C, Ghirardello S, Lavizzari A, Passera S, Mosca F, et al. Role of lung function monitoring by the forced oscillation technique for tailoring ventilation and weaning in neonatal ECMO: new insights from a case report. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:332.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zannin E, Neumann RP, Dellacà R, Schulzke SM. Forced oscillation measurements in the first week of life and pulmonary outcome in very preterm infants on noninvasive respiratory support. Pediatr Res. 2019;86:382–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Veneroni C, Mercadante D, Lavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Mosca F, Dellacà RL. Changes in respiratory mechanics at birth in preterm infants: a pilot study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55(7):1640–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. De Luca D, van Kaam AH, Tingay DG, Courtney SE, Danhaive O, Carnielli VP, et al. The Montreux definition of neonatal ARDS: biological and clinical background behind the description of a new entity. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(8):657–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Plavka R, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome—2016 update. Neonatology. 2016;107–25.

  34. Higgins RD, Jobe AH, Koso-Thomas M, Bancalari E, Viscardi RM, Hartert TV, et al. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: executive summary of a workshop. J Pediatr. 2018;197:300–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaczka DW, Ingenito EP, Lutchen KR. Technique to determine inspiratory impedance during mechanical ventilation: implications for flow limited patients. Ann Biomed Eng. 1999;27(3):340–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Simbruner G, Coradello H, Lubec G, Pollak A, Salzer H. Respiratory compliance of newborns after birth and its prognostic value for the course and outcome of respiratory disease. Respiration. 1982;43(6):414–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Goldman SL, Gerhardt T, Sonni R, Feller R, Hehre D, Tapia JL, et al. Early prediction of chronic lung disease by pulmonary function testing. J Pediatr. 1983;102:613–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bhutani VK, Abbasi S. Relative likelihood of bronchopulmonary dysplasia based on pulmonary mechanics measured in preterm neonates during the first week of life. J Pediatr. 1992;102:605–13.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Freezer NJ, Sly PD. Predictive value of measurements of respiratory mechanics in preterm infants with HMD. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993;16:116–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lui K, Lloyd J, Ang E, Rynn M, Gupta JM. Early changes in respiratory compliance and resistance during the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the era of surfactant therapy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000;30(4):282–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Choukroun ML, Tayara N, Fayon M, Demarquez JL. Early respiratory system mechanics and the prediction of chronic lung disease in ventilated preterm neonates requiring surfactant treatment. Biol Neonate. 2003;83:30–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Snepvangers Y, De Winter J, Burger H, Brouwers H, Van Der Ent CK. Respiratory outcome in preterm ventilated infants: importance of early respiratory system resistance. Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163:378–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. van Lierde S, Smith J, Devlieger H, Eggermont E. Pulmonary mechanics during respiratory distress syndrome in the prediction of outcome and differentiation of mild and severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1994;17(4):218–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirpalani H, Schmidt B, Gaston S, Santos R, Wilkie R. Birthweight, early passive respiratory system mechanics, and ventilator requirements as predictors of outcome in premature infants with respiratory failure. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1991;10(3):195–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Brochard L, Slutsky A, Pesenti A. Mechanical ventilation to minimize progression of lung injury in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(4):438–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Soll R, Özek E. Prophylactic animal derived surfactant extract for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1997;4.

  47. Rojas-Reyes MX, Morley CJ, Soll RF. Prophylactic versus selected use of surfactant for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;14(3).

  48. Stevens TP, Blennow M, Myers EW, Soll R. Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4.

  49. Kattwinkel J, Bloom BT, Delmore P, Glick C, Brown D, Lopez S, et al. High-versus low-threshold surfactant retreatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics. 2000;106(2I):282–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dargaville PA, Aiyappan A, De Paoli AG, Dalton RGB, Kuschel CA, Kamlin CO, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants: incidence, predictors and consequences. Neonatology. 2013;104(1):8–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Laughon M, Allred EN, Bose C, O’Shea TM, Van Marter LJ, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Patterns of respiratory disease during the first 2 postnatal weeks in extremely premature infants. Pediatrics. 2009;123(4):1124–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Verder H, Ebbesen F, Fenger-Grøn J, Henriksen TB, Andreasson B, Bender L, et al. Early surfactant guided by lamellar body counts on gastric aspirate in very preterm infants. Neonatology. 2013;104(2):116–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Daniel IWBDS, Fiori HH, Piva JP, Munhoz TP, Nectoux AV, Fiori RMH. Lamellar body count and stable microbubble test on gastric aspirates from preterm infants for the diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome. Neonatology. 2010;98(2):150–5.

  54. De Luca D, Autilio C, Pezza L, Shankar-Aguilera S, Tingay DG, Carnielli VP. Personalized medicine for the management of RDS in preterm neonates. Neonatology. 2021;118(2):127–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Maurizio Ginepro for technical assistance with the device used for lung mechanics assessment and the NICU’s nursing personnel of Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico for support during data measurement.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for conducting the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Via Commenda 12, 20135, Milan, Italy

    Anna Lavizzari, Francesco Beretta, Claudia Fumagalli, Mariarosa Colnaghi & Fabio Mosca

  2. Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria-DEIB Laboratorio di Tecnologie Biomediche-TechRes Lab, Politecnico di Milano University, Milan, Italy

    Chiara Veneroni, Valeria Ottaviani, Marta Tossici & Raffaele L. Dellacà

  3. Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    Fabio Mosca

Authors
  1. Anna Lavizzari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chiara Veneroni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesco Beretta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Valeria Ottaviani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Claudia Fumagalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marta Tossici
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mariarosa Colnaghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fabio Mosca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Raffaele L. Dellacà
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AL, CV, FM and RD conceived the study design; AL, FB, VO, MT, CF, MC realized the study acquisition; CV, VO, MT performed the data analysis; AL, CV, MC, FB, CF, VO, MT, FM and RD critically interpreted the data; AL drafted the first version of the manuscript; CV, FM, RD critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual contents; all coauthors gave the final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Lavizzari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol obtained the ethical committee approval (Milano Area 2; protocol no. 462_2015) in April 2016. The parents of all patients enrolled signed the consent for participation before the study entry.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

RD reports Grants and others from Restech, personal fees from Philips Healthcare, outside the submitted work; Dr. Dellaca’ has a patent on the detection of EFL by Forced Oscillation technique (FOT) with royalties paid to Philips Respironics and Restech Srl, a patent on monitoring lung volume recruitment by FOT with royalties paid to Vyaire, and a patent on early detection of exacerbations by home monitoring of FOT with royalties paid to Restech and is co-founder and shareholder of Restech Srl, a spin-off company of the Politecnico di Milano University producing medical devices for lung function testing based on FOT. AL was a consultant for Getinge, Vyaire and Chiesi S.p.A and received travel grants from Vapotherm and Fischer&Pykel. The other authors have no financial interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lavizzari, A., Veneroni, C., Beretta, F. et al. Oscillatory mechanics at birth for identifying infants requiring surfactant: a prospective, observational trial. Respir Res 22, 314 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12931-021-01906-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12931-021-01906-6

Keywords

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us