Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) and no ILA groups*

From: Interstitial lung abnormality evaluated by an automated quantification system: prevalence and progression rate

Characteristics

Total

ILA

No ILA

P-value

Number of patients

2,890

387

2,503

 

Age, years

55.8 ± 9.2

58.1 ± 9.1

55.5 ± 9.2

< 0.001

Male

2,297 (79.5)

292 (75.5)

2,005 (80.1)

0.042

Ever-smoker (n = 2,873)

2,032 (70.7)

250 (64.9)

1,782 (71.6)

0.007

BMI, kg/m2

24.3 ± 3.3

25.3 ± 2.9

24.1 ± 3.4

0.001

WBCs, ×103/µL

5.8 ± 1.7

6.0 ± 1.8

5.8 ± 1.7

0.024

Hgb, g/dL

14.8 ± 1.4

14.8 ± 1.5

14.8 ± 1.3

0.888

Platelet, ×103/µL

231.5 ± 51.1

231.0 ± 50.8

231.5 ± 51.1

0.857

ESR, mm/h

12.3 ± 10.3

14.8 ± 12.4

11.8 ± 9.9

< 0.001

HbA1c†, %

5.8 ± 0.8

5.8 ± 0.8

5.8 ± 0.8

0.076†

Total cholesterol, mg/dL

188.9 ± 34.4

188.6 ± 35.7

189.0 ± 34.1

0.818

Triglyceride, mg/dL

128.5 ± 75.9

137.1 ± 75.4

127.2 ± 75.9

0.017

HDL, mg/dL

53.6 ± 13.9

50.4 ± 13.2

54.1 ± 13.8

< 0.001

LDL, mg/dL

116.1 ± 30.3

116.9 ± 31.3

115.9 ± 30.1

0.058

Protein, g/dL

7.1 ± 0.4

7.2 ± 0.4

7.1 ± 0.4

< 0.001

Albumin, g/dL

4.2 ± 0.3

4.2 ± 0.2

4.2 ± 0.3

0.140

BUN, mg/dL

13.4 ± 3.4

13.4 ± 3.7

13.4 ± 3.4

0.726

Creatinine, mg/dL

0.9 ± 0.2

0.9 ± 0.2

0.9 ± 0.2

0.479

FVC, predicted %

89.0 ± 11.1

85.8 ± 11.1

89.5 ± 10.9

< 0.001

FEV1, predicted %

88.6 ± 16.1

87.6 ± 12.5

88.8 ± 12.2

0.099

FEV1/FVC, %

77.1 ± 3.2

77.7 ± 7.2

76.9 ± 7.3

0.075

  1. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations or numbers (%).;ILA, interstitial lung abnormality; BMI, body mass index; WBCs, white blood cells; Hgb, haemoglobin; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced vital capacity in 1 s; *evaluated on the basis of follow-up chest computed tomography (CT) images; † ILA vs. no ILA: 5.843 ± 0.765 vs. 5.769 ± 0.764, the values were rounded to one decimal place